Jack Albrecht
Nov 19, 2021

Your first paragraph is bullshit. Clearly there were enough police there, and a 17-yr-old heavily armed and armoured civilian is at best a threat.

That being said, your second paragraph is 100% correct.

The solution is that Rittenhouse should not have been there armed and armoured. No one should have been.

Jack Albrecht
Jack Albrecht

Written by Jack Albrecht

US expatriate living in the EU; seeing the world from both sides of the Atlantic.

No responses yet