Yes, you have the right to an opinion. But stating someone is guilty when discussing what they might or might not have done means you're not open to the possiblity that you might be wrong.

The US picked the post-coup President. We have the audio of Victoria Nuland. It is not "Russian propaganda." Joe Biden bragged in 2018 that he could force the Ukrainian government to fire a national attorney general. That and a shitton of other examples show that the real power in Ukraine post 2014 coup was the US.

I don't know what Olgino means, and I don't give a fuck what or who you think I am. Ever since Clinton's political attack dog used hired hands to sway online opinion it has become a go-to for anyone losing an argument on merits to try to discredit the person they are losing the argument to by saying or insinuating (that is you here) that the person they are losing the argument on the merits to is somehow "not valid" because they are a "bot" - whatver the fuck that actually means.

If you think I'm a bot, as in an AI construct, because that is what a "bot" actually is, then how pathetic are you that you can't hold your own against me.

If you are using the term bot to mean someone paid to have an opinion and making comments then the same holds as in the last paragraph.

The bottom line is that it doesn't fucking matter who I am. My arguments and evidence don't get better or worse whether I'm actually Jack Albrecht who has been commenting regularly for years, or if I've been taken over by a body snatcher an am now a controlled by [insert sinister sounding organization].