Jack Albrecht
2 min readNov 30, 2021

--

Well, I'll see your "bullshit" and raise you a 4-year study by the University of Alaska and a group called "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" (ae911truth.org - I'm a member) that has multiple court cases running.

The four year study was on on WTC Building 7, the third building that fell from two planes.

Your description of how the buildings fell is part of why I know the official story is bullshit. Again, I'm not claiming to know exactly what happened. Steel frame buildings don't collapse onto their own footprint like WTC 1, 2 and 7 all did. Particularly they cannot "pancake." To pancake, all of the structural members holding up the building must fail virtually simulatneously.

The WTC lower floors inner core columns were much larger than the upper floors. Even if there was complete structural failure on the levels where the planes hit, the lower floors' support columns were undamaged. The upper floors would decelerate as they came down. What was filmed (particularly clear with building 7) was free-fall or near free fall speed for multiple seconds. That is physically impossible as a result of planes hitting 3-4 floors near the top of the buildings, and impossible in WTC 7 as a results of office fires.

You can prove this to yourself with cardboard boxes, as the physical principles are the same. Stack 5-6 boxes on top of each other, and then crush down. The farther you push down, the harder it gets. The only way you could push down at the same speed as at the top is if you first cut the side walls of the lower boxes multiple times.

More importantly, this has been proven mathematically and in physical tests multiple times. One example was a group burned a four story steel framed building to try to recreate the math from NIST. The NIST math is wrong. NIST has refused to release their "proof" despite multiple law suits.

Did you know that in the 1940s a plane flew into the Empire State Building? The result was exactly the same as the first 90 minutes the planes hit WTC 1 and 2. Massive fires over multiple floors and that was all.

The designers of WTC 1 and 2 in the 1960s designed the buildings to withstand a fully loaded jumbo jet crashing into them precisely because of the 1940s Empire State Building accident. There is film of the WTC architect discussing exactly what would happen - and did happen, when the planes hit.

There are a large number of other anomalies, but the main points are that the official mathematical explanation for the collapses has been proven to be incorrect, and NIST refuses to explain or correct their errors. The three WTC buildings did NOT collapse from planes hitting two of them.

--

--

Jack Albrecht
Jack Albrecht

Written by Jack Albrecht

US expatriate living in the EU; seeing the world from both sides of the Atlantic.

No responses yet