Ah, Felicity of the passive-aggressive attack lines. You might want to stop huffing glue if you are seeing more than one profile for me. I have one and just one. Same South Park avatar that I’ve had nearly since I started commenting on Medium.

I stand by my analysis: The Iowa chaos is a feature, not a bug. The chaos is being used by the establishment to make their election fraud less obvious. Here is a long twitter thread listing many, many issues with the results. The overarching point is that the mistakes almost universally go to help Buttigieg and hurt Sanders. When officials are confronted with clear “errors” they refuse to fix them based upon “something, something can’t change it.” Which is of course ridiculous. If you are shown a math error, you don’t stand on protocol unless you want the error.

Here is a detailed analysis with corrections (based on official data) of the Iowa results. The end result is that Bernie Sanders won not only the popular vote, but also the SDEs. It is my opinion that this result was understood very early on by the DNC, and the last week of chaos has been entirely to keep Bernie from getting the 8–10% bump in the polls in NH that Pete got (and is now losing) and thus running away with NH.

Political campaign victories are very much a matter of momentum. Cheating someone out of that momentum right at the beginning has a huge effect on the election.

There is nothing wrong with a fair fight. The problem is, as in 2016, the establishment is cheating. Their problem is that because Bernie is so much stronger than in 2016, they have to cheat early and big before he is too strong to cheat.